Evaluating Websites

Introduction

Throughout a person’s life, one is constantly searching for information. One, and sometimes the only, place a person seeks information is on the internet. This is because the internet is growing ever more convenient and requires few skills to navigate. The internet, even though it is easy to retrieve information, does have its drawbacks. One being that just because information is easy to obtain does not mean that it is accurate or valid for that matter.

Pretty much anyone can post information on the internet with relative ease. All that is really needed is internet access, and some knowledge on how to post the information. So, a person does not have to be an authority on any subject to display their knowledge on the internet. With this in mind, the question of how to evaluate the information is constantly being brought up.

The 5 major things to look for when evaluating a source of information are: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage/suitability.

You might also consider asking yourself the 5W questions:

• What type of document is it?
• Who created it?
• Why was the material published?
• When was it published?
• Where was the resource published?
• How was the information gathered and presented?

Authority

While trying to evaluate the authority of a site, there are a couple of questions that can be asked. One is, “is the author an expert on the topic, has the author written other material on the topic?” One way to help answer this is to try and find the author’s credentials on the site. Finding credentials will aid in determining why the author is qualified for writing on the topic. If the author is a professor at a college, and the topic being discussed is in his/her field of research, then the author has good credentials and the information most likely valid.

However, for other authors, some background research may be necessary. One quick way to find some background information on the author is to see if there are biographical sources on the author, or perhaps the source provides biographical information.

Another way to quickly determine authority is to look at the URL of the internet source. More reliable sources typically end either in .gov, .edu, or .org. While less reliable sources end in .com. This is because everyone has access to these sites and can post information on these websites. So a source such as wikipedia.com, is not a very reliable source because anyone can post information on that site, regardless of their position.

Accuracy

Another thing to ask when evaluating a source is, “how accurate is the information?” This may require that the person seeking the information has some background knowledge on the subject. Having background knowledge on the subject will make things easier and quicker when deciding whether or not a source is completely inaccurate or does provide some relevance. One more way to help with determining the accuracy of the information from a source is to see if there is a list of sources the author may have used to retrieve information to write their paper. If the author does provide a list of sources, a person can compare the information in the paper with the information from other authors.

Objectivity

In searching for objectivity, one thing to search for is minimal bias. Is the author trying to persuade your opinion? The author should write to present facts and not try to change opinion. The author’s work should contain objectivity. If the author is trying to persuade opinion, then the author’s work is possibly skewed. The author may only be presenting information that will help alter a person’s opinion, while avoiding other information. Sometimes the author only wants you to know what they believe to be true instead of the complete scenario. If this is the case, then the source probably isn’t a reliable one to use, and if the author presents all information without bias, it is probably a more reliable source to use.

Currency

A few things to look for while determining how current an article is are: is there a date present on the article, if so, when the article was last updated, and is the information current. If the article was created or last updated several years prior to the date found, then the information may be out dated. More information on the topic may have been discovered, or some of what was thought to be factual may have been found to be incorrect after more research. The more current a source is, the more reliable the source may be. The author has incorporated more information, and has had a chance to adapt new information, and if need be, alter the information that the author has already retrieved.

Coverage/suitability

In the source, one thing to look for is how in depth the source delves into the topic. Does the source explain in detail the topic at hand, or does it just give a brief summary? If a source gives a brief summary of the topic, it probably isn’t a very reliable source.

All information sources are not created equal. Sources can vary greatly in terms of how carefully they are researched, written, edited, and reviewed for accuracy. Common sense will help you identify obviously questionable sources, such as tabloids that feature tales of alien abductions, or personal websites with glaring typos. Sometimes, however, a source’s reliability, or lack of it, is not so obvious. To evaluate your research sources, you will use critical thinking skills consciously and deliberately.

Summary

Questions to ask yourself while evaluating websites as resources for your research include:

• Authority: Is the author an expert on this topic?

• Accuracy: How accurate is this information?

• Objectivity: Does the author show any bias?

• Currency: Is this webpage maintained over time?
• Coverage: How deeply does your resource explain a topic?

Sources:

“Social and Cultural Foundations of American Education.” By Wikibooks. Retrieved from: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Social_and_Cultural_Foundations_of_American_Education/Dynamic_Learning_Environment/Resource_Evaluation Licensed under: CC-BY-SA