Applying the TILT Model

This image shows a magnify glass with the words Transparency in Learning and Teaching written on the glass.

Depending on the type of course project you are working on, you may be required to apply the TILT model to one or more assessments.  Even if your project does not require the use of the TILT model, you are encouraged to consider including this best practice in your course design.

What is the TILT model?  The Transparency in Learning and Teaching (TILT) project aims to advance equitable teaching and learning practices that reduce systemic inequities in higher education through two main activities:

  1. Promoting students’ conscious understanding of how they learn
  2. Enabling faculty to gather, share and promptly benefit from current data about students’ learning by coordinating their efforts across disciplines, institutions and countries

When applying the TILT model to an assignment, the following components should be included:

  • Purpose: Define the learning outcomes, in language and terms that help students recognize how this assignment will benefit their learning. Indicate how these are connected with institutional learning objectives, and how the specific knowledge and skills involved in this assignment will be important in students’ lives beyond the contexts of this assignment, this course, and this college.
  • Skills:  Identify and describe the specific skills that will be utilized for this particulate assignment.  Terms from Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives may help you explain these skills in language students will understand.
  • Knowledge:  Identify the specific content knowledge that will be covered as a result of this assignment.
  • Task:  Define what activities the student should do/perform.  Action verbs from Bloom’s Taxonomy might be helpful.  List any steps or guidelines, or a recommended sequence for the students’ efforts.  Specify any extraneous mistakes to be avoided.  If there are sound pedagogical reasons for withholding information about how to do this assignment, protect students’ confidence and sense of belonging in college with a purpose statement like this: “The purpose of this assignment is for you to struggle and feel confused while you invent and test your own approach for addressing the problem…”
  • Criteria for Success:  Define the characteristics of the finished product. Provide multiple examples of what these characteristics look like in real-world practice, to encourage students’ creativity and reduce their incentive to copy any one example too closely.  Engage students in analyzing multiple examples of real-world work before the students begin their own work on the assignment. Discuss how excellent work differs from adequate work. This enables students to evaluate the quality of their own efforts while they are working, and to judge the success of their completed work. It is often useful to provide or compile with students a checklist of characteristics of successful work. Students can also use the checklist to provide feedback on peers’ coursework. Indicate whether this task/product will be graded and/or how it factors into the student’s overall grade for the course. Later, asking students to reflect and comment on their completed, graded work allows them to focus on changes to their learning strategies that might improve their future work.[1]

Check out the example below to see how the TILT model was applied to make a science assignment more transparent.

Example Assignment: Science-101[2]

Exercise 3: Scientific Evidence (LESS TRANSPARENT)

Read through your example scientific poster and answer the following questions.

Title of your example poster:

  1. What is the ethical question that is being asked?
  2. What pieces of evidence do they provide in support of and in opposition of their question?
    In Opposition? In Support?
  3. Are the pieces of evidence from peer-reviewed scientific sources (look at the references to
    be sure)?
  4. How are the pieces of evidence presented (numbers, graphs, tables, figures)?
  5. How are the pieces of evidence analyzed in the Discussion section?
  6. What is the ethical conclusion?
  7. Do the pieces of evidence support their conclusion? Why or why not?
  8. Are you convinced by their evidence of their ethical conclusion? Why or why not?
  9. What questions do you still have after reading this poster? What could they have done
    better?

Exercise 3: Scientific Evidence (MORE TRANSPARENT)

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to analyze an existing scientific poster. This will
increase your familiarity with how scientific posters are constructed, and will help you later in the
course when you research, design, and create your own effective poster with sufficient scientific
evidence that supports your conclusion. As a result of completing this assignment, you will be able
to identify the sources of scientific information, interpret the results, and critically analyze the
scientific merit of the conclusion of an existing scientific poster.

Task: Read through your example scientific poster and answer the following questions.

Title of your example poster:

  1. Identify the ethical question that is being asked.
  2. List the evidence the authors provide in support of and in opposition to their question.
  3. Examine the pieces of evidence listed in #2 above. Identify whether they are from popular
    (Pop), scientific peer-reviewed (SPR), or non-scientific peer-reviewed (NSPR) sources, and
    note each statement above as (Pop), (SPR), or (NSPR). Do you think there is enough
    scientific evidence from peer-reviewed articles? Why or why not?
  4. Describe how the pieces of evidence are presented (e.g., numbers, graphs, tables, figures).
  5. Explain how the pieces of evidence are analyzed in the Discussion section.
  6. Identify the ethical conclusion.
  7. After analyzing the content of the poster, do the pieces of evidence support their
    conclusion? Explain why or why not.
  8. After assessing the scientific merit of their evidence, are you convinced of their ethical
    conclusion? Explain why or why not.
  9. List the questions you still have after reading this poster. What could they have done better?

Criteria: The grade on this assignment will reflect how completely you answer the questions.

 

Want to see more discipline examples?  Check out the TILT Higher Ed Examples and Resources page. 

 

Tools for Revising/Creating your Own Transparent Assignments[3]

 


  1. Winkelmes, M. (2014). TILT higher ed examples and resources.  TILT Higher Ed.  Retrieved from https://tilthighered.com/tiltexamplesandresources.  Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.
  2. Winkelmes, M. (2014). TILT higher ed examples and resources.  TILT Higher Ed.  Retrieved from https://tilthighered.com/tiltexamplesandresources.  Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.
  3. Winkelmes, M. (2014). TILT higher ed examples and resources.  TILT Higher Ed.  Retrieved from https://tilthighered.com/tiltexamplesandresources.  Licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.

License

Course Development Handbook Copyright © by The American Women's College. All Rights Reserved.